fbpx

25 WEIRD Moments Exposing Pierre Poilievre—Canada’s Polished Trump!

Strap the Fk In, HERe WE Go!

Strap in, Canada—it’s time to expose Pierre Poilievre for exactly what he is: Donald Trump in a cheap Canadian suit. Sure, he might speak softly, avoid the spray-tan, and pretend politeness—but make no mistake, he’s every bit the anti-democratic, truth-shredding charlatan his MAGA idol is.

Forget the fake patriotism and the maple-MAGA mirage; Pierre Poilievre’s political playbook is lifted straight from Mar-a-Lago and project 2025, dripping with hypocrisy, lies, and calculated chaos. Here’s the cold, hard reality check this nation desperately needs: 25 of Pierre Poilievre’s weirdest, greasiest, and most disturbing moments that reveal the true threat he poses to Canadian unity and democracy.

01 – Pierre Poilievre’s High School Yearbook Controversy: Criticizing the Welfare State at 18

At 18, Pierre Poilievre was already voicing strong conservative views. Some claim his high school yearbook contained the quote, “What is truly horrific is the existing welfare state,” while others argue it first appeared later in his writing. Regardless, his stance against government intervention was evident early on. His teenage words, whether an offhand remark or a deeply held belief, raise questions about how much his views have changed—or if they have at all.

  • Jacobin – “Canada Elections: Conservatives, Liberal Austerity, Crypto, Poilievre”:
    https://jacobin.com/2022/03/canada-elections-conservatives-liberal-austerity-crypto-poilievre
    (This article from Jacobin offers a critical analysis of the Canadian political landscape, examining how Pierre Poilievre’s messaging—particularly his embrace of crypto and critiques of liberal austerity—reflects broader conservative strategies in contrast to the Liberals’ policies.)
  • Breach Media – “Pierre Poilievre: Harper, But With His Fangs Bared”:
    https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievre-harper-but-with-his-fangs-bared/
    (This article examines Pierre Poilievre’s political evolution by comparing his style to that of former Prime Minister Stephen Harper, while highlighting his more aggressive, combative approach. It delves into how Poilievre’s rhetoric and tactics have shifted to appeal to a conservative base in today’s turbulent political climate.)
  • Jacobin – “Poilievre, Friedman, and Neoliberalism: The Canadian Conservative Conundrum”:
    https://jacobin.com/2025/02/poilievre-friedman-neoliberalism-canada-converatives
    (This article from Jacobin critically examines how Pierre Poilievre’s political strategies align with neoliberal economic principles inspired by Milton Friedman, arguing that his brand of conservatism reinforces market fundamentalism while neglecting broader social equity issues in Canada.)

02 – Pierre Poilievre’s Controversial ‘Anglo-Saxon’ Remark: Dog Whistle or Misstep?

Pierre Poilievre made the statement, “I’m a believer in using simple Anglo-Saxon words,” which sparked controversy due to its racial undertones. Critics argue that the term “Anglo-Saxon” is often associated with white supremacist rhetoric and has been used as a dog whistle in political discourse. The phrase has deep historical connotations linked to nativist ideologies, and its use in modern political rhetoric has been criticized as inappropriate and potentially harmful.

03 – Pierre Poilievre’s YouTube Scandal: Hidden #MGTOW Tags and the Backlash

Pierre Poilievre’s YouTube channel included a hidden misogynistic tag linked to the #MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) movement. This acronym is associated with an online community that promotes male supremacy and advocates for men to separate entirely from women. The tag was embedded in dozens of Poilievre’s videos, including those related to Canadian politics and tributes, but was not visible to viewers. The tag was discovered by Global News, leading to significant backlash and calls for accountability. Poilievre’s team claimed they were unaware of the tag’s existence and removed it immediately after being informed. Critics argue that this incident reflects poorly on Poilievre’s digital strategy and raises questions about the audience his content was targeting.

04 – Pierre Poilievre’s MAGA Tactics: The Trump Connection and Roger Stone’s Influence

Pierre Poilievre has been criticized for adopting tactics similar to those used in the MAGA movement in the U.S., including personal attacks and smears against opponents. This combative style, seen as destructive rather than constructive, has drawn comparisons to Donald Trump’s approach. The controversy deepened with revelations that Roger Stone, a key Trump ally known for his aggressive political strategies, has been in communication with the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC). Critics argue that this association suggests a deliberate shift towards more divisive and polarizing tactics in Canadian politics.

05 – Pierre Poilievre’s Anti-Carbon Tax Stance: Aligning with Putin, Trump, and Tucker Carlson

Pierre Poilievre’s opposition to the carbon tax has been controversial, especially given his alignment with figures like Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, and Tucker Carlson. Critics argue that his stance on climate policies reflects a broader alignment with right-wing populism and skepticism of global efforts to combat climate change. This association has raised concerns about Poilievre’s international alliances and the potential impact on Canada’s role in global environmental initiatives. His opponents suggest that by opposing the carbon tax and aligning with these controversial figures, Poilievre may be isolating Canada from key international partners and undermining its commitments to climate action.

06 – Pierre Poilievre’s Controversial Vote Against Aid to Ukraine: A Foreign Policy Misstep?

Pierre Poilievre faced criticism for voting against aid to Ukraine during a parliamentary session. His vote was seen as controversial, particularly in light of the widespread support for Ukraine in its conflict with Russia. Critics argue that his stance on this issue contradicts Canada’s long-standing commitment to supporting Ukraine and its sovereignty. The vote has been used by opponents to question Poilievre’s foreign policy priorities and his alignment with international human rights and democratic principles.

  • The Globe and Mail – “Conservatives fail in final Commons effort to stop new trade deal with Ukraine”
    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-conservatives-fail-in-final-commons-effort-to-stop-new-trade-deal-with/
    (The article details how Conservative MPs, led by Pierre Poilievre, were unable to block the passage of an updated free trade agreement with Ukraine, a move that critics say underscores a troubling shift in the party’s stance on foreign aid and trade with a key ally)
  • Montreal Gazette – “Canada’s support for Ukraine faces domestic scrutiny amid evolving trade and climate debates”
    https://www.montrealgazette.com/news/canada/article131911.html
    (This article examines how shifting domestic political priorities—such as debates over carbon pricing and free trade agreements—are challenging Canada’s traditional support for Ukraine, with critics questioning whether current votes signal a broader reorientation of foreign policy)
  • National Observer – “Pierre Poilievre has some explaining to do about Ukraine”
    https://www.nationalobserver.com/2024/02/12/opinion/pierre-poilievre-has-some-explaining-do-about-ukraine
    (This opinion piece details how Poilievre’s repeated votes against a Canada–Ukraine free trade deal—allegedly justified by objections to carbon pricing—have raised serious questions about his foreign policy priorities and his commitment to supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression)

07 – Pierre Poilievre’s Awkward Exchange with President Biden: ‘Loyal, huh?’

During U.S. President Joe Biden’s visit to Canada, Pierre Poilievre introduced himself in the receiving line as “The Leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition.” Biden humorously responded with, “Loyal, huh?” This interaction highlighted Biden’s wit and Poilievre’s formal use of political titles, which some saw as an attempt to emphasize his role. The exchange was noted by observers as an amusing moment during the official visit. Hmmmm,…I don’t think that’s very fucking funny at all!

  • Yahoo News Canada – “‘Loyal Opposition?’: Viral video shows Biden joking with Poilievre over his formal title”
    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/loyal-opposition-video-of-us-president-joe-biden-meeting-conservative-leader-pierre-poilievre-goes-viral-201327602.html
    (This article reports on the viral video capturing the exchange where Poilievre introduces himself as “the leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition” and Biden’s amused retort, “Loyal, huh?” It provides context on Biden’s diplomatic visit and highlights the lighthearted moment amid formal proceedings.)
  • Fox News – “Biden jokes with Canada’s Conservative leader about ‘loyal opposition’ during visit”
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-jokes-canadas-conservative-leader-loyal-opposition
    (Fox News covers the exchange, noting Biden’s humorous response during the handshake with Poilievre. The piece frames the moment as a display of Biden’s wit during an official visit, contrasting Poilievre’s formal introduction with Biden’s relaxed remark.)
  • YouTube – “CAUGHT ON CAMERA: Did Biden question Poilievre’s loyalty?”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6L441UI-08
    (In this viral video clip, U.S. President Joe Biden meets Canadian Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre during his visit to Canada. Poilievre introduces himself as “the leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition” and Biden humorously replies “Loyal, huh?”, highlighting a moment of levity during formal diplomatic proceedings.)

08 – Endorsed by Extremism: Alex Jones Backs Poilievre

Far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones has publicly stated that Pierre Poilievre is leading a global far-right movement, alongside figures like Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro and Italy’s Giorgia Meloni. Jones praised Poilievre during his broadcast on InfoWars, identifying him as part of a rising global resistance against what Jones calls the “New World Order.” This endorsement by a controversial figure like Jones, known for spreading dangerous conspiracy theories and falsehoods, has raised concerns about the perception of Poilievre’s political stance and the company he keeps.

09 – Crypto Conundrum: Poilievre Praises Breedlove’s Extremist Rhetoric

Pierre Poilievre appeared on a cryptocurrency podcast hosted by Robert Breedlove, a known conspiracy theorist. During the podcast, Poilievre discussed bitcoin and monetary issues, praising Breedlove’s content. However, Breedlove has made several controversial statements, including comparing central banking to slavery and spreading COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Poilievre’s association with Breedlove has drawn criticism, particularly due to the host’s extremist views and the potential implications for Poilievre’s political image.

  • CBC News – “Explainer: Pierre Poilievre’s Cryptocurrency Views”
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-crypto-explainer-1.6653739
    (This article provides an in-depth look at Poilievre’s stance on cryptocurrencies, outlining his support for Bitcoin and discussing how his monetary policy views align with his broader political ideology.)
  • YouTube – “Pierre Poilievre on Cryptocurrency and Economic Policy”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnNjp8kP7xs
    (In this video, Poilievre outlines his views on digital currencies, emphasizing his support for Bitcoin and free-market monetary policies, and discusses the broader implications of cryptocurrency in modern economic debates.)

10 – Tweet Turmoil: Poilievre’s Equivocation of Socialism, Fascism, and Communism Sparks Criticism

Pierre Poilievre sparked controversy after tweeting that “national socialists” in Germany and Italy were, as the name suggests, “socialists.” In his tweet, Poilievre equated fascism, socialism, and communism, arguing that these ideologies all glorify the state over the people and inevitably lead to horrific outcomes. This statement has been widely criticized by historians, political scientists, and commentators for its inaccurate understanding of political ideologies, particularly the distinction between socialism and fascism. Critics pointed out that while the Nazi party in Germany used the term “socialist” in its name, its policies and practices were far removed from the principles of socialism, which traditionally advocates for the collective ownership of the means of production and a more egalitarian society. Fascism, by contrast, is characterized by authoritarianism, nationalism, and the suppression of political dissent, often with the aim of maintaining the power of the ruling elite. By conflating these ideologies, Poilievre was accused of oversimplifying complex political concepts and misleading the public. His remarks were seen as an attempt to discredit socialism by linking it to the atrocities committed under fascist regimes, which many found to be a historically inaccurate and politically motivated distortion of facts.

11 – Pierre Poilievre Under Fire: MPs’ Controversial Meeting with Nazi Sympathizer Christine Anderson

Pierre Poilievre faced significant criticism after several of his MPs, including Dean Allison, Colin Carrie, and Leslyn Lewis, were photographed meeting and dining with Christine Anderson, a member of the European Parliament and a known Nazi sympathizer. Anderson is affiliated with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has been associated with extremist views, including anti-immigrant and nationalist ideologies. Poilievre condemned Anderson’s views as “vile” and stated that his MPs were unaware of her controversial beliefs at the time of the meeting. However, this incident has raised concerns about the judgment and vetting processes within Poilievre’s party.

12 – Pierre Poilievre’s Support for the Freedom Convoy: Controversial Involvement and Alleged Coordination

Pierre Poilievre publicly supported the Freedom Convoy, a series of protests that began in early 2022 against COVID-19 vaccine mandates and restrictions. Poilievre made statements that encouraged the protestors, framing the convoy as a legitimate expression of frustration against government overreach. His support came just days before the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act to address the disruptions caused by the protests, which included blockades and the occupation of downtown Ottawa. Poilievre’s backing of the convoy has been criticized by those who view the protests as having gone beyond peaceful demonstration into unlawful and disruptive actions. Additionally, critics have accused Poilievre of having flags made for the Freedom Convoy before he was even elected as Leader of the Conservative Party, raising questions about his level of involvement and support for the movement. The allegations suggest that Poilievre may have been more deeply involved in the organization or promotion of the convoy than he publicly acknowledged. This has led to speculation and criticism regarding the extent of his coordination with the protestors, as well as concerns about the political implications of such involvement, especially given the controversial nature of the convoy.

  • The Tyee – “Poilievre’s Big Bet on Convoy Politics”
    https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2023/04/05/Poilievre-Big-Bet-On-Convoy-Politics/
    (This analysis examines how Pierre Poilievre’s support for the Freedom Convoy marked a strategic pivot in his political approach, highlighting how his backing of the protests was both a calculated move to tap into populist sentiment and a risky bet that could reshape his public image.)
  • CBC News – “Poilievre, Trudeau, Carbon Protest, Alex Jones and Diagolon Controversy”
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-trudeau-carbon-protest-alex-jones-diagolon-1.7183430
    (This article examines the overlapping controversies in Canadian politics, including Poilievre’s stance on carbon taxes and his associations with contentious figures like Alex Jones and Diagolon, contrasting these with Trudeau’s policies and analyzing the resulting political fallout.)
  • National Post – “Poilievre faces scrutiny over Freedom Convoy protesters”
    https://nationalpost.com/news/poilievre-freedom-convoy-protesters
    (This article details how Pierre Poilievre’s association with the Freedom Convoy has sparked criticism, examining his support for the protest movement and the ensuing debate over his political judgment and vetting processes within the Conservative Party.)

13 – Pierre Poilievre’s Controversial Handshake with Diagolon Extremist: A Risky Association?

Max Fawcett criticized Pierre Poilievre for his interactions with a Diagolon extremist, particularly focusing on Poilievre’s handshake with Jeremy Mackenzie, the founder of Diagolon. Diagolon is a far-right extremist group with connections to anti-government ideologies. Fawcett, writing for the National Observer, highlighted the dangers of Poilievre’s interactions with such figures, especially given that Diagolon has been flagged by law enforcement as a potentially violent extremist group. Despite Poilievre’s claims that he was unaware of Mackenzie’s affiliations, the ongoing connections between Poilievre and Diagolon supporters have raised serious concerns about his judgment and the message it sends to the public.

14 – Pierre Poilievre Criticized for Stepping Out of Diagolon-Linked Trailer: Extremist Ties Under Scrutiny

Pierre Poilievre came under fire after being caught on camera stepping out of a trailer linked to the far-right extremist group Diagolon. This incident has raised serious concerns about his judgment and associations, leading to widespread criticism. The footage, widely circulated online, has fueled speculation about Poilievre’s proximity to extremist elements, with opponents questioning whether this was an oversight or indicative of deeper issues. The incident has intensified scrutiny of his political alliances and raised alarms about the potential normalization of extremist ideologies in Canadian politics.

15 – Pierre Poilievre’s Lumberjack Photo Op Backfires: Mocked as Inauthentic and Staged

Pierre Poilievre faced widespread mockery and criticism for two bizarre attempts to craft a rugged, relatable image. In one incident, a campaign video showed him awkwardly caressing and speaking to a piece of barn wood—an effort to suggest that “money doesn’t grow on trees” that many viewers found forced and unnatural. In another, a photo op had him posing as a lumberjack in a plaid shirt with an axe, a staged image that quickly spawned memes and online ridicule. Both stunts were seen as desperate, inauthentic attempts to appeal to working-class voters, ultimately contributing to a broader narrative questioning the sincerity of his public persona and the effectiveness of his campaign strategies.

  • YouTube – “Pierre Poilievre’s Lumberjack Weirdo Moment: Democracy Is Wood?”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3Mmd3llxP8
    (In this bizarre clip, Pierre Poilievre—dressed in a plaid shirt and channeling a lumberjack persona—is seen caressing a piece of wood on the wall while making odd comparisons of democracy to wood. He admitted that he didn’t collect his information properly, a move that has led to widespread mockery of his weirdo lumberjack phase.)
  • The Globe and Mail – “Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Leadership: Politics in the Twilight Zone”
    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/toronto/article-pierre-poilievre-conservative-leadership/
    (This article takes a deep dive into Poilievre’s bid for Conservative leadership, portraying his political maneuvers as operating in a twilight zone—a pure poly of politics where populist theatrics and opportunistic branding blur the lines between genuine policy and salacious spectacle. Critics argue that his approach, far from being substantive, is more about showmanship in an era where political reality feels increasingly surreal.)
  • YouTube – “Pierre Poilievre’s Lumberjack Economic Analogy: Money Doesn’t Grow on Trees, It’s Just a Piece of Wood”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8MZCpsqaFE&t=95s
    (In this clip, Poilievre makes a comparison between economic principles and a piece of wood. His assertion that “money doesn’t grow on trees” degenerates into an absurd display of political theatrics that has many critics dismissing his analogy as completely out of touch.)
  • X – “Family Lumberjack Cosplay: Poilievre’s Halloween Shoutout to ‘Working-Class’ Values”
    https://x.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1719537235274432582
    (Pierre Poilievre and his family donned lumberjack attire for Halloween—complete with a prominently displayed axe—in a bizarre attempt to project a rugged, working-class image. Critics have mocked the staged look, questioning the authenticity of his political persona.)

16 – Pierre Poilievre Mocked for Muscle Shirt and Girdle: Inauthentic Image-Building Backfires

Pierre Poilievre has faced significant criticism and mockery for his attempts to “humanize” his image, including reportedly spending over a million dollars on these efforts, which involved being photographed in a “muscle shirt” and allegedly wearing a girdle during public appearances. These actions were widely ridiculed on social media as inauthentic and staged, with critics accusing him of hypocrisy, especially given his rhetoric against “radical gender ideology.” The muscle shirt photo was seen as an awkward attempt to project a more rugged, tough image, while the girdle incident further highlighted perceived contradictions in his public persona and political messaging. Critics have pointed out that Poilievre’s focus on his appearance, particularly in ways that some associated with gender-related issues, contradicted his public stance on gender identity and expression. The controversy surrounding these expenditures and image-building efforts has sparked debate about the authenticity of his public image and the consistency of his messaging.

  • CBC News – “Poilievre’s Makeover: Shedding the Glasses, Raising Eyebrows”
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-makeover-glasses-1.6911533
    (CBC News examines Poilievre’s decision to ditch his signature glasses—a move critics say is part of a costly, ongoing makeover aimed at crafting a tougher, more appealing public persona. Observers question the sincerity of such image shifts, suggesting they may clash with his own rhetoric and further fuel doubts about his authenticity.)
  • YouTube – “In-Depth Look: Poilievre’s Image Makeover Under Fire”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7v7BDopZ-9k
    (This video features commentary on Pierre Poilievre’s recent attempts to overhaul his public image. It critically examines his staged photo ops and makeover stunts, with analysts and social media clips highlighting the widespread mockery and inauthenticity of his efforts.)
  • Montreal Simon – “How Pierre Poilievre’s Makeover Failed”
    https://montrealsimon.blogspot.com/2023/07/how-pierre-poilievres-makeover-failed.html
    (This blog post offers a critical analysis of Poilievre’s attempts to reinvent his public image through staged public appearances. The author argues that his makeover—marked by contrived, inauthentic displays—has failed to resonate with voters and instead has only fueled widespread mockery.)
  • X – “Where’s the Girdle, Pierre?” Tweet Fuels Speculation on Poilievre’s ‘Shifting’ Physique
    https://x.com/RGBAtlantica/status/1807920189905780904
    (This post showcases side-by-side images of Poilievre’s supposedly “jacked” versus “unjacked” appearances. Critics claim these photos illustrate an artificially crafted image—one that contradicts his political messaging and raises doubts about the authenticity of his public persona.)

17 – Pierre Poilievre Criticized for Insensitive Comments on Indigenous Compensation and Hard Work

Pierre Poilievre has faced significant backlash for his controversial statement that Indigenous people “need to learn the value of hard work” more than they need compensation for the abuse endured in residential schools. His comments were widely condemned as not only insensitive but also as a gross oversimplification of the complex and painful history of Indigenous communities in Canada. The residential school system, which forcibly removed Indigenous children from their families and subjected them to physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, has left a lasting legacy of trauma that continues to affect survivors and their descendants. Critics argue that Poilievre’s remarks reflect a dismissive attitude toward the importance of acknowledging and addressing these historical injustices through meaningful compensation and reconciliation efforts. By suggesting that hard work is a more critical need than reparations, Poilievre has been accused of undermining the ongoing efforts to achieve justice and healing for Indigenous peoples. His statement has sparked widespread debate about the role of political leaders in promoting reconciliation and the dangers of perpetuating harmful stereotypes about Indigenous communities.

  • CBC News – “Conservative MP apologizes for hurtful comments on Aboriginal people”
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/conservative-mp-apologizes-for-hurtful-comments-on-aboriginal-people-1.712106
    (This article highlights the backlash following Pierre Poilievre’s insensitive remarks towards Indigenous communities. His comments, which downplayed the need for compensation for residential school abuses by emphasizing “hard work,” were widely criticized as dismissive of the deep, painful legacy of Indigenous suffering in Canada.)
  • The Walrus – “Poilievre and Reconciliation: A Disrespectful Approach to Indigenous Issues”
    https://thewalrus.ca/poilievre-reconciliation/
    (This article from The Walrus critically examines Pierre Poilievre’s approach to reconciliation, highlighting his dismissive and disrespectful comments towards Indigenous communities. It argues that his rhetoric undermines meaningful efforts to address the historical injustices and ongoing challenges faced by Indigenous peoples in Canada.)
  • The Globe and Mail – “Tory MP apologizes for hurtful remarks”
    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/tory-mp-apologizes-for-hurtful-remarks/article25579789/
    (This article details how Pierre Poilievre was forced to apologize for his disrespectful remarks toward Indigenous communities. His comments were widely criticized as dismissive of the historical injustices faced by Indigenous peoples, further straining efforts toward reconciliation in Canada.)

18 – Pierre Poilievre’s Video Blunder: Russian Fighter Jets and Foreign Footage in Canadian Pride Promo

In a recent promotional video released by Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party, intended to evoke Canadian pride, the footage included a glaring mistake: the use of Russian-made fighter jets. The video, which featured stock footage from various sources, also included clips from the U.S., Serbia, and Italy, all of which contributed to a portrayal of Canada that critics described as narrow, rural, and whitewashed. This choice of imagery has been widely criticized, especially given the ongoing geopolitical tensions involving Russia. The video was quickly deleted, but not before it sparked significant backlash. Critics argue that this incident reflects poorly on Poilievre’s campaign, raising questions about the competency of his digital team and the authenticity of the message they intended to convey.

  • CBC News – “Conservatives delete video after Russian jets mistakenly featured”
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/conservatives-video-deleted-russian-jets-1.7298754
    (CBC News reports that a promotional video by the Conservative Party, intended to showcase Canadian pride, was swiftly deleted after it was discovered to contain footage of Russian fighter jets, sparking widespread criticism of the campaign’s digital strategy.)
  • The Guardian – “Canada Conservatives’ video features footage from other countries, prompting scrutiny”
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/20/canada-conservatives-video-other-countries
    (This article from The Guardian analyzes a promotional video released by the Conservative Party, which mistakenly included footage from foreign countries. Critics argue that the use of non-Canadian imagery, such as Russian fighter jets and clips from the U.S., Serbia, and Italy, undermines the intended message of Canadian pride and calls into question the campaign’s authenticity.)
  • CNN – “Canadian Conservative Video Stumbles Over Russian Jets Footage”
    https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/21/americas/canada-russian-jets-video-intl-latam/index.html
    (CNN reports on a controversy surrounding a Canadian Conservative promotional video that erroneously featured Russian fighter jets along with footage from other countries. The mistake has sparked international criticism and raised serious questions about the campaign’s digital strategy and authenticity.)
  • The Tyee – “Please Advise: Poilievre Weird Video”
    https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2024/08/21/Please-Advise-Poilievre-Weird-Video/
    (This opinion piece critiques Poilievre’s bizarre promotional video, questioning whether its odd blend of foreign imagery and strange editing reflects a genuine portrayal of Canadian identity or is simply a misguided, populist attempt at image-making.)

19 – Pierre Poilievre’s False Claim: Canada Has the Worst Economy in the G7

Pierre Poilievre falsely claimed that Canada has the worst economy in the G7. This statement, made during a session in the House of Commons, was quickly debunked by economists and fact-checkers. In reality, Canada’s economic growth was among the highest in the G7, contradicting Poilievre’s assertion. This claim is part of a broader narrative Poilievre has used to criticize the government’s handling of the economy, but it lacks factual support.

  • X – “Poilievre’s Repeated Worst-in-G7 Claim”
    https://x.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1752763090112839944
    (In this tweet, Pierre Poilievre again insists Canada has the worst economy in the G7, citing an op-ed rather than verifiable data. Critics argue this is part of his ongoing pattern of using dubious sources to bolster a misleading narrative—one that economists have repeatedly debunked.)
  • Facebook – “Poilievre’s Disinformation on G7 Income Growth”
    https://www.facebook.com/PierrePoilievreMP/posts/1023213605833158
    (In this Facebook post, Pierre Poilievre once again falsely claims Canada has the worst per-capita income growth in the G7. Economists and fact-checkers have repeatedly refuted his assertion, labeling it as misleading and lacking credible evidence.)
  • Facebook – “Poilievre Doubles Down on ‘Last Place’ G7 Narrative”
    https://www.facebook.com/PierrePoilievreMP/posts/1012360993585086/
    (Here, Pierre Poilievre again insists that Canada’s economy ranks last among G7 nations for per-capita growth—an oft-repeated claim debunked by multiple economists. Critics accuse him of misusing or cherry-picking data to push a misleading narrative that undermines Canada’s actual economic performance.)

20 – Pierre Poilievre’s Misleading Claim: Trudeau Government Allows Crack Smoking with Paper Straws

Pierre Poilievre made a controversial and misleading statement, claiming that Justin Trudeau’s government allows people to legally smoke crack, but only if they use an environmentally friendly paper straw instead of plastic. This remark was widely criticized for being both absurd and inaccurate, as it conflates environmental policies with serious issues related to substance abuse. Critics argue that Poilievre’s comment was a thinly veiled attempt to mock Trudeau’s environmental initiatives while trivializing the complex issue of drug addiction. Although intended as a satirical or rhetorical jab, the statement has been condemned for its potential to spread misinformation and distract from important public health discussions.

  • The Hub – “Seven Zingers from Poilievre’s Calgary Stampede Speech: ‘Crack with Paper Straws’ Claim Sparks Debate”
    https://thehub.ca/2024/07/13/lets-bring-it-home-alberta-seven-zingers-from-pierre-poilievres-speech-at-the-calgary-stampede/
    (This article highlights seven key lines from Pierre Poilievre’s Calgary Stampede speech, including his controversial quip about the Trudeau government supposedly allowing crack smoking with paper straws. Critics argue that this jab oversimplifies addiction issues while taking an offhand swipe at environmental policy.)
  • X – “Poilievre Doubles Down on ‘Crack with Paper Straws’ Claim”
    https://x.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1814739769672290312?lang=en
    (Here, Pierre Poilievre reiterates his controversial assertion that the Trudeau government is effectively legalizing crack use while banning plastic straws—a remark widely condemned by addiction experts for trivializing a serious public health issue and dismissed by critics as a gross distortion of both drug policy and environmental regulations.)

21 – Pierre Poilievre Criticized for Homophobic and Transphobic Remarks on ‘Radical Gender Ideology’

A video surfaced in which Pierre Poilievre made homophobic and transphobic remarks, accusing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of imposing “radical gender ideology” on children. The video sparked significant backlash from LGBTQ+ communities and allies, who criticized Poilievre’s comments as harmful and perpetuating negative stereotypes. Critics argue that his remarks contribute to a broader narrative of discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals and undermine efforts to promote inclusivity and acceptance, particularly in educational settings. The backlash highlighted the divisive nature of his rhetoric on gender issues and raised concerns about the impact of such rhetoric on public discourse and policy.

22 – Pierre Poilievre’s Evangelical Outreach: Strategic or Risky Move in Canadian Politics?

Pierre Poilievre has been criticized for his efforts to court evangelical voters in Canada, a move that some see as an appeal to religious fundamentalism. In recent months, Poilievre has made several campaign-style visits to evangelical Christian churches, particularly in ridings held by Liberal MPs. These visits have been seen as a strategic effort to win over a specific voter base that feels marginalized or restricted in their freedoms under current policies. While Poilievre himself is not an evangelical, he is surrounded by influential figures within the Conservative Party who are, and his outreach to these communities is seen as a way to solidify support among socially conservative voters. This approach has drawn both support and criticism, with some observers noting that while Poilievre’s engagement with these groups is politically savvy, it also risks alienating more moderate voters. His efforts to appeal to these voters without overtly aligning with extreme religious views is a delicate balance that has been a topic of discussion in the media.

  • Global News – “In Groundbreaking Move, Poilievre Campaigns Among Evangelical Christians”
    https://globalnews.ca/news/10604598/in-groundbreaking-move-poilievre-campaigns-among-evangelical-christians/
    (This article details how Pierre Poilievre’s campaign has taken an unprecedented step by actively engaging with evangelical Christian communities. His outreach includes visiting churches and promoting traditional values—a strategy aimed at winning support from socially conservative voters, though it has also sparked debate over the potential risks of aligning too closely with religious fundamentalism.)
  • The Tyee – “Churches and Pierre Poilievre: Unlikely Allies in the Campaign Trail”
    https://thetyee.ca/News/2024/07/22/Churches-Pierre-Poilievre/
    (This article explores how various churches have become involved in Pierre Poilievre’s political outreach, highlighting both the potential advantages and the controversies of aligning religious institutions with his campaign strategy.)

23 – Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives Accused of Targeting Experts: Undermining Expertise for Political Gain?

Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party has been accused of systematically targeting experts whose research and opinions conflict with their political agenda. According to an investigation by the Toronto Star, this tactic appears to be part of a broader strategy to undermine expertise and discredit professionals who challenge Conservative policies, particularly in areas like climate science and public health. Critics warn that this approach could erode public trust in evidence-based decision-making and promote a climate of anti-intellectualism, where expert opinions are devalued in favor of partisan narratives. This trend raises concerns about the long-term impact on Canadian policy-making and the integrity of public discourse.

24 – Danielle Smith Faces Backlash After Admitting Outreach to Trump Allies to Support Poilievre

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is facing widespread criticism following revelations she communicated with allies of former U.S. President Donald Trump, urging them to “pause tariffs” to benefit Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre during Canada’s election period. In a controversial interview with Breitbart, Smith openly stated that prolonging tariff disputes was benefiting the Liberal Party, directly suggesting that a Poilievre victory would be more favorable to U.S. conservative interests. Smith’s statements have been condemned by political analysts and opposition leaders as irresponsible and potentially harmful to Canadian sovereignty, raising serious questions about foreign interference and the boundaries of provincial and federal political advocacy. Critics argue that her actions blur the line between legitimate political strategy and inappropriate foreign alignment, fueling a broader debate about the ethical limits politicians should respect when pursuing partisan goals.

25 – Pierre Poilievre’s Refusal to Obtain Security Clearance

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has come under fire for refusing to obtain the security clearance needed to access classified national security information. Critics argue that this decision reflects a lack of transparency and responsibility, especially for someone in a leadership position. Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc has pointed out that Poilievre’s refusal prevents him from being fully informed on key security issues, raising concerns about his preparedness and trustworthiness. The controversy has sparked speculation that Poilievre might be avoiding potential scrutiny or damaging revelations, further complicating his political image.

  • CBC News – “Poilievre’s Absence from CSIS Briefing Raises Security Questions”
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-csis-briefing-1.7444082
    (CBC News reports that Pierre Poilievre did not attend a CSIS briefing on national security, a decision that has fueled criticism regarding his commitment to staying informed on key security issues and has raised broader concerns about transparency and accountability.)
  • CBC News – “Blanchet, Poilievre spar over security clearance requirements”
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/blanchet-poilievre-security-clearance-1.7362068
    (This article covers a debate between Quebec sovereigntist leader Françoise David/Blanchet and Pierre Poilievre over his refusal to obtain a security clearance, highlighting concerns that his decision undermines his ability to be fully informed on national security issues.)
  • Policy Magazine – “Poilievre’s Trumpian Aversion to the Value of Intelligence”
    https://www.policymagazine.ca/poilievres-trumpian-aversion-to-the-value-of-intelligence/
    (This article criticizes Pierre Poilievre’s dismissive attitude toward intelligence gathering, highlighting what many see as a “Trumpian” disregard for the role of expert analysis in national security. It examines his refusal to obtain necessary security clearance and questions his commitment to being well-informed on critical security matters.)
  • iPolitics – “Poilievre’s approach to national security is complete nonsense, says expert”
    https://www.ipolitics.ca/news/poilievres-approach-to-national-security-is-complete-nonsense-says-expert
    (This article from iPolitics reports on criticism from a national security expert who dismisses Pierre Poilievre’s stance on security as “complete nonsense.” The piece scrutinizes his refusal to obtain a security clearance and other policies, arguing that his approach undermines effective national security management.)

IT’S PAST TIME TO Kick This COMPRoMISED RUSSIAN Clown CAR to the Curb!

Pierre Poilievre’s weirdness isn’t amusing—it’s dangerous. His refusal to engage transparently with national security, flirtation with foreign interference, and relentless adoption of far-right U.S. tactics are red flags Canada can’t afford to ignore. Stop falling for slick suits and polite authoritarianism. It’s time we woke up and took our democracy seriously.

This bullshit is changing every minute – follow on BlueSky for the latest.

Cranky Canuck's Special Report banner featuring cartoon character Cranky, alongside the title "RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.

Envelope Twitter Tiktok Facebook Instagram Vimeo
MAIN
SHOP
LEGAL

© 2025 Cranky Cartoons All Rights Reserved.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top